The cancellation of bail by the Supreme Court was to maintain the sanctity of a fair trail and to avoid any witness tampering.
The Supreme Court of India addressed a criminal appeal related to an order granting bail to Respondent No.1. The case involved numerous criminal complaints, including harassment, attempts on the life of the complainant, and alleged collusion with police officials. Despite several pending cases, the High Court granted bail to Respondent No.1 in one of the cases.
However, after examining the case, it was found that there were compelling reasons to cancel the bail. The Court emphasized the need for a fair trial, considering the serious allegations and the potential influence of the accused. It also discussed the power to recall witnesses under Section 311 of the Criminal Procedure Code to ensure a fair and free adjudication of the trial.
In conclusion, the Court canceled the bail granted to Respondent No.1, directed his surrender, ordered the recall of crucial witnesses, provided security to the complainant and her family, and mandated an investigation into threats or inducements. The Trial Court was instructed to observe Respondent No.1’s conduct during cross-examination. These measures were taken to ensure the integrity of the trial and the protection of witnesses.
Munilakshmi …..Appellant
Versus
Narendra Babu & Anr. …..Respondents decided by the Supreme Court on October 20, 2023.